Esti grav in eroare // Acordul se refera la reducerea emisiilor gazelor cu efect de sera, nu la obligatia SUA de a plati bani catre diverse state. India nu-si va dubla numarul de termocentrale. China va aplica prevederile imediat, nu din 2030. UE nu va cheltui "enorm" ca de altfel nici o alta tara, e un plan rational gandit sa nu puna in pericol dezvoltarea economica, dar nici mediul. In afara de SUA nimeni nu mai paraseste Acordul.

Industria manufacturiera e distrusa // de automatizare si robotizare. Atat SUA cat si UE s-au dezvoltat economic promovand in acelasi timp protectia mediului. Ba inca s-au creat noi locuri de munca in noile industrii verzi. China are o serie de obiective asumate care vor fi puse in aplicare imediat, nu din 2030 cum fals afirmi tu. Ai preluat minciunile lui Scott Pruitt noul sef EPA, un cunoscut negationist al cauzelor antropogene ale incalzirii globale, la a carui campanie a contribuit si industria combustibililor fosili. Afirmatiile sale sunt false si nu sunt sustinute de dovezi. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2128402-environment-chief-says-us-should-exit-paris-climate-agreement/ http://www.factcheck.org/2017/03/pruitt-paris-accord/ De fapt China si-a anulat planurile de constructie a 100 de termocentrale. Pruitt face confuzie intre Acordul de la Paris si Protocolul de la Kyoto: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/04/14/epa-administrator-scott-pruitts-claim-that-china-and-india-have-no-obligations-until-2030-under-the-paris-accord/?utm_term=.178db3979b8d

Nu renaste nimic // Industria manufacturiera e pe duca, intai s-a delocalzat, in viitor va fi inlocuita de roboti. Trump nu poate opri inevitabilul, decat daca ia masuri socialiste de dirijare a economiei, pana atunci piata decide unde si la ce pret sa produca. Dupa ce ii demonizezi pe ecologisti pe urma ii citezi, insa doar ce iti convine. Intai ai zis ca China nu ia nici o masura pana in 2030, acum zici ca ia dar nu sunt suficiente. Uite ce-ai uitat sa citezi: "...although the rate of increase of total emissions would become near-zero under the most optimistic assumptions of continued coal abatement (at an average growth rate of 0.3%/year in total GHG emissions between 2017 and 2030). As the NDC acknowledges that addressing these gases is important, further policy action may be expected to address non- CO2 emissions as well." Plus alte citate relevante: The latest analysis from the Climate Action Tracker indicates that these emissions may, in fact, already have stopped increasing and reached peak levels. The ongoing reduction in coal use for the third year in a row has had a major impact, and, if they were to continue at similar rates in the next decade, total Chinese GHG emissions will only show a very slight increase in the period 2015–2030, and essentially plateau at close to 12.0 GtCO2e/year. Our analysis shows that China will achieve both its 2020 pledge and its 2030 plans. China is implementing significant policies to address climate change, most recently aiming to restrict coal consumption, which may well have already peaked, based on recent estimates Under the “continued coal abatement” scenario, where the recent decreases in coal consumption continue at a similar pace for the next few years—forming the lower range of the 2030 projections—CO2 emissions would already have plateaued in 2015, and will decrease substantially up to 2030, reaching the NDC peaking target around ten years early.

Comentariu sters de utilizator // None

De unde ai scos teoria asta fantezista ? // Ne oferi si noua o sursa credibila sau vrei sa-ti credem speculatiile bazate pe imaginatie ?

Inconsistenta logica // Intai te plangi ca Acordul e unul tiranic care ingenuncheaza SUA, cand vezi ca nu tine diversiunea asta schimbi tactica, acum afirmi ca Acordul e prea slab, ca nu sunt sanctiuni. Cum poti da pe cineva in judecata fara un temei juridic ? Daca prin definitie acest Acord este unul voluntar si nu obligatoriu, asta inseamna ca nu are putere de lege si nici un stat nu poate fi tras la raspundere. Orice actiune in justitie este fara obiect.

asta // alta politica in afara de santaj, nu stie. curat.... murdar, imparate.