Greseala? // Au publicat prea multe dintr-o data.....Trebuia sa o faca treptat...Si (de ce nu?) pe bani, la diverse publicatii.

Sa mai publice biografii // Banuiesc ca are mai multe: pentru cine intreaba ! Nu prea a iesit schema cu bani luati pe buzz-ul de leaks astepta fraieri cu donatii "pentru libertatea cuvantului (si propasirea materiala a smecherilor - in subsidiar). Fara gluma - ar trebui sa le ajunga fondurile de la "serviciile" ce le-au furnizat documente. Sau nu mai e nevoie de ei (WL)?

ESTI SIGUR? // Tu ai citit ceva din materialele alea? Asa cum rezulta ele America iese foarte bine. Mai prost ies ceilalti. Cred ca vorbesti din impresii...

exact, credem ca s-au facut cine stie ce dezvaluir // cand de fapt telegramele WikiLeaks dezvaluie lucruri stiute deja, de exemplu ca soldatii americani omoara civili in Irak si afganistan, astea-s stiri vechi la fel ca abuzurile soldatilor USA fata de detinutii irakieni din inchisoarea Abu Ghraib. Daca publica niste dezvaluiri despre organizarea atentatelelor WTC sau arsenalul nuclear al Israelului puteam zice ca a captat atentia, dar asa consider ca prin aceste dezvaluiri USA au iesit f bine chiar.

De unde? // Astia imi aduc aminte de fabula aia cu ouale fierte, stiti voi, aia cu tipul care manca 2 oua fierte si nu are bani sa le plateasca, si revine dupa cativa ani si cand vrea sa le platreasca, carciumarul ii cere o suma fabuloasa (sa zicem ... 400 de mii de euro pe saptamana) motivand ca daca nu manca ouale alea ele ar fi scos pui, care deveneau gaini, si faceua la randul lor oua, si alti pui, apoi gaini, iar oua ... si in cativa ani acolo ajungea. Bineinteles, uitan ca ouale, erau, de fapt, fierte. La fel si astia. Pierd 400 de mii de euro pe saptamana ... ca oricum nu aveau de unde sa-i priemasca. Mai bine zicea 400 de milioane pe zi, ca tot aia e ...

Mda... // Pierde exact asa cum si-a pierdut si el credibilitatea. Assange? Un socialist oportunist mercantil si ipocrit.

Un parlamentar american ... // are alte opinii ... http://www.marijuana.com/current-events/157323-biggest-military-leak-history-wikileaks-releases-390-000-iraq-war-documents-5.html WikiLeaks ... The hysterical reaction makes one wonder if this is not an example of killing the messenger for the bad news ... the information has caused no known harm to any individual, but it has caused plenty of embarrassment to our government ... how the U.S. government should prosecute an Australian for treason for publishing U.S. secret information that he did not steal? Just as with the Vietnam War, the Iraq War was based on lies ... Questions to consider: Number 1: Do the America People deserve know the truth regarding the ongoing wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen? Number 2: Could a larger question be how can an army private access so much secret information? Number 3: Why is the hostility mostly directed at Assange, the publisher, and not at our governments failure to protect classified information? Number 4: Are we getting our moneys worth of the 80 Billion dollars per year spent on intelligence gathering? Number 5: Which has resulted in the greatest number of deaths: lying us into war or Wikileaks revelations or the release of the Pentagon Papers? Number 6: If Assange can be convicted of a crime for publishing information that he did not steal, what does this say about the future of the first amendment and the independence of the internet? Number 7: Could it be that the real reason for the near universal attacks on Wikileaks is more about secretly maintaining a seriously flawed foreign policy of empire than it is about national security? Number 8: Is there not a huge difference between releasing secret information to help the enemy in a time of declared war, which is treason, and the releasing of information to expose our government lies that promote secret wars, death and corruption? Number 9: Was it not once considered patriotic to stand up to our government when it is wrong?