Hotnews utilizează fişiere de tip cookie pentru a personaliza și îmbunătăți experiența Dumneavoastra pe site-ul nostru. Am actualizat politicile pentru a integra în acestea modificările specificate de Regulamentul (UE) 2016/679 privind protecția persoanelor fizice în ceea ce privește prelucrarea datelor cu caracter personal și privind libera circulație a acestor date. Va rugam sa cititi modul in care Hotnews.ro prelucreaza datele cu caracte personal. Prin continuarea navigării pe site-ul nostru confirmati acceptarea utilizării fişierelor de tip cookie conform 
Procurorul special Robert Mueller a anunțat miercuri că își dă demisia din Departamentul de Justiție, în prima sa declarație după finalizarea anchetei privind posibila ingerință a Rusiei în alegerile prezidențiale din 2016 s-a încheiat. Acesta a mai spus că inculparea președintelui Donald Trump ”nu a fost opțiune” legală, relatează AFP. Președintele Donald Trump a spus miercuri că declarația procurorului Robert Mueller nu a adus nimic noi despre el și este timpul să meargă mai departe. ”Cazul este închis”, a reacționat Trump pe Twitter.
UPDATE 19.51: Președintele Comisiei Judiciare din Camera Reprezentanților, Jerrold Nadler, a promis miercuri un răspuns al Congresului la ”infracțiunile, minciunile” lui Donadl Trump, la câteva minute după declarația lui Robert Mueller care a spus că inculparea unui președinte în exerciuțiu este neconstituțional.
UPDATE 19.15: ”Nu se schimbă nimic cu privire la raportul lui Mueller. Nu au fost probe suficiente și în acest caz, în țara noastră, o persoană este inocentă. Cazul este închis! Mulțumesc.”, a reacționat Trump pe Twitter.
Acesta a subliniat că în cazul în care Comisia de anchetă ar fi fost convinsă că preşedintele Donald Trump nu a comis nicio infracţiune, ar fi transmis clar acest lucru.
În prima sa apariție publice de la începerea anchetei în 2017, Mueller a spus că politica Departamentului de Justiție a împiedicat punerea sub acuzare a președintelui pentru o infracțiune, pe motiv că este în funcție.
”Un președinte nu poate fi pus sub acuzare pentru o infracșiune federală în timp ce este în funcție. Este neconstituțional”, a spus Mueller.
Procurorul special a mai spus că nu crede potrivită o mărturie a sa în Congres, în ciuda doreinței democraților de a-l audia.
Aceasta este prima sa declarație publică despre anchetă de la publicarea raportului său în aprilie. Mueller a concluzionat că nu a fost o conspirație între campania lui Trump și Moscova, dar a refuzat să ofere vreo concluzie cu privire la posibila obstrucționare a justiției de către președintele Donald Trump.
Carevasazica nu zice ca e nevinovat, ci ca nu oate fi pus sub acuzare. A detaliat multiple ocazii in care presedintele a obstructionat justitia, dar a lasat Congresul sa decida din cauza imunitatii.
Trump si oamenii lui sunt nevinovati. Acum e randul lui sa ancheteze de unde a pornit hoaxul si mai ales ce ilegalitati s-au comis pe timpul anchetei impotriva sa. E un tip razbunator. De asta toti cei implicati in ancheta schelalaie disperatii si incep aruncarea pisicii.
Din raport:
1. The report said Trump said the following to James Comey: “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy.”
2. Some officials with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence recalled that Dan Coats, the director, told them immediately after a March 2017 meeting that Trump had asked Coats to intervene with Comey and stop the FBI’s Russia investigation.
3. “Substantial evidence indicates that the catalyst for the President’s decision to fire Comey was Comey’s unwillingness to publicly state that the President was not personally under investigation, despite the President’s repeated requests that Comey make such an announcement,” the Mueller report said.
4. The president called then called Don McGahn, the White House counsel at that time, and directed him to have Mueller removed because of asserted conflicts of interest.
5. He “dictated a message to be delivered to Attorney General Sessions that would have had the effect of limiting the Russia investigation to future election interference only.”
6. Actions by Trump and his personal counsel “could have had the potential to affect Flynn’s decision to cooperate, as well as the extent of that cooperation". “With respect to Manafort, there is evidence that the President’s actions had the potential to influence Manafort’s decision whether to cooperate with the government.”
7. “There is evidence that could support the inference that the President intended to discourage Cohen from cooperating with the government.
Mueller: "If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."
Sa inteleg ca e vorba de opinii? Pai trebuie inchis la parnaie si topita cheia in acid. :))))))
Deja e atata de ridicol ca intrece orice flat eartheri!!!
https://youtu.be/mb1Pb5fZoyM?t=246
"As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.
We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime. The introduction to volume two of our report explains that decision.
It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited.
The Special Counsel’s Office is part of the Department of Justice and, by regulation, it was bound by that Department policy. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.
The Department’s written opinion explaining the policy against charging a President makes several important points that further informed our handling of the obstruction investigation.
The opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting President of wrongdoing.
It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of an actual charge.
Mueller a fost limpede, un presedinte in functie nu poate fi pus sub acuzare de catre justitie, Congresul e singura autoritate care il poate acuza. A spus clar ca daca presedintele este nevinovat ar fi spus asta, insa nu a spus asa ceva. Nu il poate acuza direct din cauza imunitatii. De aceea nu a formulat acuzatii, ar fi incalcat legea, insa a documentat faptele si a lasat Congresul sa duca treaba mai departe.
It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of an actual charge.
Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited.
Tu imi spui ca nu am spus ca esti nevinovat.
Uau ce gimnastica mentala incerci doar pentru a-ti mentine iluzia ca Trump este un bau bau.
2. Some officials with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence recalled that Dan Coats, the director, told them immediately after a March 2017 meeting that Trump had asked Coats to intervene with Comey and stop the FBI’s Russia investigation.
3. “Substantial evidence indicates that the catalyst for the President’s decision to fire Comey was Comey’s unwillingness to publicly state that the President was not personally under investigation, despite the President’s repeated requests that Comey make such an announcement,” the Mueller report said.
4. The president called then called Don McGahn, the White House counsel at that time, and directed him to have Mueller removed because of asserted conflicts of interest.
5. He “dictated a message to be delivered to Attorney General Sessions that would have had the effect of limiting the Russia investigation to future election interference only.”
6. Actions by Trump and his personal counsel “could have had the potential to affect Flynn’s decision to cooperate, as well as the extent of that cooperation". “With respect to Manafort, there is evidence that the President’s actions had the potential to influence Manafort’s decision whether to cooperate with the government.”
7. “There is evidence that could support the inference that the President intended to discourage Cohen from cooperating with the government.
8. From summer 2017 through 2018, the president attempted to have Attorney General Sessions reverse his recusal, take control of the special counsel’s investigation and order an investigation of Hillary Clinton.
Mueller: "If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."
Seful FBI (numit de Trump insusi):
FBI Director Christopher A. Wray said Tuesday that he did not consider court-approved FBI surveillance to be “spying” and said he had no evidence the FBI illegally monitored Donald Trump’s campaign during the 2016 election.
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-fbi-chief-no-evidence-spy-trump-20190507-story.html
"Late 2015: British intelligence agencies detect suspicious interactions between Russia and Trump aides that they pass on to U.S. intelligence agencies."
"July 31, 2016: The FBI opens its counterintelligence investigation into Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 election. The investigation is triggered when Australian authorities contact the agency — realizing that Papadopoulos’s May mention of Russian dirt to Downer, the diplomat, was validated by the release of stolen data."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/03/24/timeline-what-weve-learned-so-far-about-russia-trump-campaign
Nu de alta dar practic orice actiune sau lege putea fi interpretata ca si obstructionare. De la darea afara a lui Comey la Kavanaugh. Tot in regnul conspiratiilor te afli.
"“By June 2017, the President became aware of emails setting up the June 9, 2016, meeting between senior campaign officials and Russians who offered derogatory information on Hillary Clinton as ‘part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,’” the report said.
“On multiple occasions in late June and early July 2017, the President directed aides not to publicly disclose the emails, and he then dictated a statement about the meeting to be issued by Donald Trump Jr. describing the meeting as about adoption.”
Fapta de obstructionare a justitiei exista independent de fapta de colaborare cu Rusia.
De fel toti democratii au acces la tot, la emailuri la raportul Muller, tot. Marota asta cu facut public e ca sa ce? Sa il judece publicul? Majoritatea dovezilor sunt necncludente si ar avea ca scop doar radicalizarea populatiei. E idiotic.
Dar pun pariu ca in curand o sa posteze pe HN.