Purtatorul de cuvant al Ministerului chinez de Externe, Jiang Yu, a anuntat insa ca tara sa are in vedere o "dubla strategie": continuarea dialogului cu Teheranul si mentinerea posiblitatii unei actiuni punitive, daca negocierile esueaza. Purtatorul chinez de cuvant a iesit cu aceasta declaratie dupa o serie de discutii intre presedintele chinez Hu Jintao si omologul sau american Barack Obama, "gresit" intelese de partea americana.
"China crede intotdeauna ca dialogul si negocierile sunt cele mai bune solutii pentru aceasta problema. Presiunea si sanctiunile nu pot sa o rezolve", a explicat Jiang. Atat Washington, cat si Beijingul sunt implicate in negocieri cu Teheranul, alaturi de Marea Britanie, Franta, Germania si Rusia, in contextul in care Barack Obama vrea sa impuna sanctiuni dure impotriva Iranului. China si Rusia, ambele state cu drept de vot in Consiliul de Securitate al ONU, au declarat intotdeauna ca este de preferat diplomatia sanctiunilor impotriva Iranului.
La inceputul saptamanii, ambasadorul Iranului la ONU a lansat un atac virulent catre noua politica nucleara a presedintelui american Barack Obama, calificand-o drept "terorism de stat" pentru faptul ca nu exclude folosirea armei atomice impotriva republicii islamice. "Poate fi noua politica nucleara a Statelor Unite, care nu exclude folosirea bombei atomice impotriva altori tari, printre care si Iranul, numita altfel decat terorism de stat? ", a spus Mohammed Khazaee in fata unei comisii a Adunarii Generale intr-o dezbatere asupra masurilor de eliminare a terorismului international. Washingtonul a afirmat saptamana trecuta ca va folosi arme atomice doar in "conditii extreme" si ca nu va ataca statele care nu detin armament nuclear, insa Iranul si Coreea de Nord au fost evidentiate drept exceptii de la aceasta politica.
Alegeri SUA
La fel cum au rezolvat problema in Serbia, Afghanistan, Irak?!
Daca te uiti la omul de rand din toate tarile astea, o duce mai bine? E mai fericit? Cati au murit ca victime colaterale ale acestor conflicte?
Pana la urma care a fost scopul? Exportul de democratie? Si-au dorit are asta? I-a ajutat cu ceva? I-am intrebat inainte? Chiar ne pasa de ei, sau doar repetam ce vedem la televizor?
Sanctiunile economice nu functioneaza, intr-o lume infometata de petrol, atunci singura solutie ramane razboiul. Razboiul terestru nu e o solutie singura solutie viabila sunt loviturile aeriene.
Deci nu bat campii cum iti permiti sa ma caracterizezi.
Problema care nu vrei sa o intelegi e una foarte simpla.America duce razboaie exclusiv pe baza de interese. Prosteala cu exportul de democratie dictatorii nebuni care se inarmeaza nu tine.
Problema fundamentala e ca US doreste sa securizeze resursele din Asia Centrala. Iar pentru asta varsa tot felul de texte prin media.
Esti atat de manipulat ca nici nu realizezi ca esti de acord cu o politica de atacuri militare preventive bazata pe informatii care pot fi eronate(vezi Irak)
De ce nu ataca americanii Rusia unde KGB-istul Putin taie si spanzura si este o amenintare ptr intreaga omenire?
Daca SUA chiar avea intentii de justitiari atacau tarile sus amintite , in felul demonstreaza doar ca vor petrol gratis in continuare
Iranul poate ca o fi condus de un regim nedemocratic. Acum da exemple de regim democratic... orice o fi insemnand aia... democratic...
Si pt ca Israelul e democratic America si Franta a decis acu vreo trej de ani sa le dea prin contrabanda 80 de focoase ...si tot pt acest motiv al democratiei de tip sionist evreii au drept sa bombardeze Libanul, Ghaza cu fosfor alb, au dreptul de a exproria civilii palestinieni din casele lor, evreii au dreptul si libertatea de a terorisa ziua cat mai ales noaptea familiile de crestini care mai traiesc in Palestina, au dreptul de a incercui cu gard de beton de cca 600 km o tara intrega ...separand sate de sate, familiile intre ele samd.
Deci in datorilta unei asa mari democratii sioniste fundamentaliste cu dementi cu tichie si talmudul in mana care dau din cap de 8 ori pe zi deci datorita acestui lucri evreii au dreptul de a bombarda si mai ales de a incita pe sclavii lor militari america de a bombarda cu bomba atomica.
Ceva de neincipuit?!!
Dupa ce a vazut omenirea oroarea bombei atomice si a infierat utilizarea ei tot de catre americani iaca acum vin evreii si ne spun ca e o mantuire de-a dreptul utilizarea bombeleor atomice si ca ei doar ei au voie sa le utilizeze si mai ales sa le aibe...pai de ce oare??? Ca sa aibe cu ce sa ameninte restul omenirii si sa le impuna dominarea economica si mai ales financiara!!!
Cumva dubla masura?
De aia celor puternici (bogati) le este permis sa aiba arsenal nuclear.
P.S. Opinia proprie este ca intreg arsenalul nuclear sa dispara - din pacate o utopie.
Romanii pun binele personal peste viata altora. Coruptia in esenta ei pana la urma la asta duce.
Doctorii care conditioneaza actul medical, procurorii/judecatorii care nu inchid criminali si corupti, care iesiti in libertate fac ceea ce stiu mai bine. Deturnarea fondurilor spre dinspre santatea publica in buzunarele privatilor.
Distrugerea sistemului de pensii...
Inainte sa ne dam cu parerea despre altii sa ne uitam la noi.
Si de altfel nu i-a oprit nimic pana acum iar in razboaiele alea pe care le-au avut cu fratii lor de semintie semitica doar faptul ca nu au avut bombe atomice i-a oprit sa nu foloseasca bombe atomica caci le ar fi folosit fara nici cea mai mica problema de constiinta zeloasa.
P.S. Am reluat postarea de mai devreme pentru ca n-a aparut unde am dorit sa apara.
Amin, Idi ------------------------------------------Uganda
Banzer, Colonel Hugo ---------------------------Bolivia
Batista, Fulgencio --------------------------------Cuba
Bolkiah, Sir Hassanal ----------------------------Brunei
Botha, P.W. ---------------------------------------South Africa
Branco, General Humberto ---------------------Brazil
Cedras, Raoul -------------------------------------Haiti
Cerezo, Vinicio -----------------------------------Guatemala
Chiang Kai-Shek ---------------------------------Taiwan
Cordova, Roberto Suazo ------------------------Honduras
Christiani, Alfredo -------------------------------El Salvador
Diem, Ngo Dihn ---------------------------------Vietnam
Doe, General Samuel ----------------------------Liberia
Duvalier, Francois --------------------------------Haiti
Duvalier, Jean Claude-----------------------------Haiti
Fahd bin'Abdul-'Aziz, King ---------------------Saudi Arabia
Franco, General Francisco -----------------------Spain
Hitler, Adolf ---------------------------------------Germany
Hassan II-------------------------------------------Morocco
Marcos, Ferdinand -------------------------------Philippines
Martinez, General Maximiliano Hernandez ---El Salvador
Mobutu Sese Seko -------------------------------Zaire
Noriega, General Manuel ------------------------Panama
Ozal, Turgut --------------------------------------Turkey
Pahlevi, Shah Mohammed Reza ---------------Iran
Papadopoulos, George --------------------------Greece
Park Chung Hee ---------------------------------South Korea
Pinochet, General Augusto ---------------------Chile
Pol Pot---------------------------------------------Cambodia
Rabuka, General Sitiveni ------------------------Fiji
Montt, General Efrain Rios ---------------------Guatemala
Salassie, Halie ------------------------------------Ethiopia
Salazar, Antonio de Oliveira --------------------Portugal
Somoza, Anastas
Cred ca ai dat copy-paste de unde nu trebuia! :)) In plus, unii din lista ta sunt un pic cam... morti, deci e mai greu sa fie aliati ai SUA, cum spui tu. (folosesti timpul prezent).
Dar ca sa inchei intr-o nota care sa iti placa, o sa spun atat: moarte americanilor, imperialistii americani care sug sangele poporului si traiesc pe spinarea romanilor, a somalezilor si afganilor. Si a haitienilor, sa nu uitam! :))))))
PARK CHUNG HEE
President of South Korea
Free and open expression has not come easily to South Koreans. Beatings, torture, and execution of the regimes' political opponents have been a way of life since the Korean War. The tenure of former President Park Chung Hee, who came to power in a 1961 military coup, exemplifies the kind of leader South Koreans have been forced to endure. Park's virulent anti-communism won him U.S. support. The water torture, which leaves no physical marks on the victim, was a favored technique of Park's security forces. Cold water was forced up the nostrils through a tube, while a cloth was placed in the victim's mouth to prevent breathing. Many anti-communist interrogations were run by the KCIA, a US creation modeled after the American CIA. One victim told Amnesty International, " I was taken to KCIA headquarters, my hands tied together, and I was tied to a chair. I was not allowed to have any sleep. At night, they would drag me to the basement where they would beat me with a long, heavy stick, and jump on me. They were trying to make me confess that I was a spy. Despite such brutal behavior, the US has maintained a first-rate strategic relationship with South Korea, providing successive repressive regimes with extensive US aid. Park Chung Hee was assassinated by the KCIA in 1979, but South Korea is still a nation troubled by lack of human rights.
Anti base in interior, antiamericani in exterior.
Deci pro Iran, pro palestinieni, prochavez, pro castro, etc.
In general proteroristi.
Dupa atentatele de la metroul moscovit, au tacut.
Commander of the Khmer Rouge
The bombing of Cambodia by the US from 1969 to 1972, left 600,000 civilians dead, millions of refugees, tens-of-thousands dying from disease and starvation, and the Cambodian economy and culture in ruins. Cambodians blamed the US and the puppet regime of Lon Nol for the country's destruction, and gradually sided with the guerrilla army of the Khmer Rouge led by Pol Pot, which finally defeated Lon Nol, and took power in April, 1975. Once in power, Pol Pot emptied the cities, forcing the people into the countryside. Virtually all educated people were killed and more than 1.5 million people perished in this "holocaust". Only when the Khmer Rouge was ousted by Vietnam in 1979, did the terror stop. Washington took steps to preserve the Khmer Rouge as a counter force to the Vietnamese. International relief agencies were pressured by the US to provide food and humanitarian assistance to the Khmer Rouge, which had fled to Thailand, and the US sent military aid as well. In 1982, in an effort to isolate the Vietnamese, the US forced together the three contending anti-Vietnamese groups, insisting that the Khmer Rouge be part of the negotiations. Cambodia continues to suffer from the devastation produced by both the US bombing and the Khmer Rouge atrocities. Pol Pot is considered to still be the power behind the Khmer Rouge, which has a strong presence in Cambodia today, thanks to the US.
ADOLF HITLER
Chancellor of Germany
As German bombs fell on London and Nazi tanks rolled over US troops, Sosthenes Behn president and founder of the US based ITT corporation, met with his German representative to discuss improving German communication systems. ITT was designing and building Nazi phone and radio systems as well as supplying crucial parts for German bombs. Our government knew all about this, for under a presidential order, US companies were licensed to trade with the Nazis. The choice of who would be licensed was odd, though. While the Secretary of State gave the Ford Motor Company permission to make Nazi tanks, he simultaneously blocked aid to German-Jewish refugees because the US wasn't supposed to be trading with the enemy. Other US companies trading with the Third Reich were General Motors, DuPont, Standard Oil of New Jersey, Davis Oil Co., and the Chase National Bank. President Roosevelt did not stop them, fearing a scandal might lead to another stock market crash or lower US moral. Besides, the same companies that traded with Hitler were supplying the US with its armaments, and some corporate leaders threatened to withdraw their support if Roosevelt exposed them. Henry Ford was a good friend of Hitler's. His book -- The International Jew -- had Inspired Hltler's Mein Kampf. The Fuhrer kept Ford's picture in his office, and Ford was one of only four foreigners to receive Germany's highest civilian award. As for Sosthenes Behn, at the end of the war, he received the highest civilian award for service to his country -- the United States of America.
deci sa trecem la palnul B, invazie si ocuparea iranului de catre ocidentali impreuna cu china si rusia!
sa se imparta ciolanul in mod egal la 4: sua, europa, chian si rusia!
Din pacate se cam intrezareste o "interventie chirurgicala" in care sa se elimine instalatiile nucleare.
Probabil ca si-o vor asuma SUA pentru a nu intra Israelul in hora.
A devenit cumva China tara dialogului si a negocierii, unde toata lumea e fericita?!?
China spune ca are o dubla strategie: convorbiri dimplomatice si actiuni punitive. Ce e asa de greu de tradus asta? Asa, ca sa fac o analogie, e ca si cum ii spui foarte politicos, discuti, analizezi cu cineva o situatie in care vrei sa cedeze. Iar in timp ce esti politetea si bunoavointa intruchipata, te joci cu un pistol pe masa, pistol pe care interlocutorul tau nu il are.
Sorry, eu cred ca asta e singura solutie cu Iranul. Poate parea cinic sau brutal, dar arma atomica in mana unor degenerati ca aia din conducerea Iranului e curata nebunie!
Astia nu stiu decat de frica. Daca vad ca treaba realmente se impute (pentru ei) sunt sanse sa se potoleasca. Sanctiuni economice???? Frectie cu apa rece!
Concluzionand, eu cred ca in cazul asta chinezii nu sunt impotriva americanilor, dimpotriva!